The tax cut that is in this resolution, $1.3 trillion, has an additional cost, the associated interest cost, because this is all borrowed money. That would be another about $300 billion. So the total cost goes to $1.6 trillion--truly stunning when we are already at record budget deficits, when we are at war, the cost of which no one knows, and when we are on the eve of the retirement of the baby boom generation. So there can only be one result; that is, to dramatically explode deficits and debt.
Kent Conrad: “The tax cut that is in this resolution, $1.3 trillion, has an additional cost, the associated interest cost, because…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the financial implications of a proposed tax cut during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Kent Conrad
I wish I could look you in the eye and say, you know, if we just had the will, we could reverse this, and we could go back to a time when defined benefit plans were on the increase. I do not think that is in the cards.
We did a whole series of things in our Social Security reform not to discourage people from working, but to encourage them to continue working if they are able to do so.
All the talk in the world doesn't matter if you don't actually get something done in the real world.
Can I just respond quickly, Mr. Chairman, and say when Simpson-Bowles went down, a group of six of us in the Senate, three Democrats, three Republicans, were asked by leadership to see if we couldn't come up with a way forward to adopt the…





