I have one question related to tax havens, one to tax loopholes, and one to tax gap. So my understanding, from the answer to the first question--which went to the question of tax havens--is that offshore tax havens that certain companies and individuals have been setting up in order to avoid the U.S. taxes, you have no intent in this amendment to preclude us from collecting more revenue from those who were engaged in those practices?
Questioning the intent of an amendment related to tax havens during a discussion on tax policy.
Share
More from Kent Conrad
I would say personally I would not go to a company advising me on wealth management that did not have it because I think whoever is advising me ought to have as their highest responsibility to be giving me advice that is in my interest.
I do, and I made that argument to the commission, and others on the commission made some of the points that you are making now.
Things are changing very rapidly, and it presents us with a requirement to change how we envision retirement as well.
We ought to reestablish this benefit for survivors and those affected by disability.
Other voices in this conversation
