We met with a legal expert, a constitutional law expert from the Congressional Research Service, who told us that the statute that had been proposed by the other side to protect Social Security over time, phasing out the using of Social Security surplus funds by the year 2012, would not work. I had been advised earlier in the day by a budget expert from the Budget Committee itself, a constitutional law expert from the Budget Committee itself, that it would not work. We were advised later on that day that, in fact, that was the case.
Kent Conrad: “We met with a legal expert, a constitutional law expert from the Congressional Research Service, who told us that the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the viability of a proposed statute to protect Social Security during a Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Kent Conrad
Can I just respond quickly, Mr. Chairman, and say when Simpson-Bowles went down, a group of six of us in the Senate, three Democrats, three Republicans, were asked by leadership to see if we couldn't come up with a way forward to adopt the…
We did a whole series of things in our Social Security reform not to discourage people from working, but to encourage them to continue working if they are able to do so.
It takes guts to do that, and Chairman Arrington, you have certainly led the charge on having a commission.
We admire that, and I can say on both sides of the aisle, people recognize the job he did as Budget Committee Chairman.





