This issue is simple. The question is, Are we going to have a reserve fund so that there is a solution to the tobacco controversy, that we can use the money in a way that accommodates every comprehensive bill that is before this body, introduced by Republicans or Democrats? Unfortunately, under the budget resolution, the money can only go for one purpose: Medicare. While that is an important priority, there are other priorities as well--smoking cessation, smoking prevention, health research, countertobacco advertising, easing the transition for farmers. We should not be creating supermajority hurdles in the way of tobacco legislation, and the only way we avoid that is to pass this amendment.
Kent Conrad: “This issue is simple. The question is, Are we going to have a reserve fund so that there is a solution to the tobacco…”
On the recordApril 1, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a reserve fund to address tobacco legislation and related health priorities.
Share
More from Kent Conrad
Apr 4, 2017
I wish I could look you in the eye and say, you know, if we just had the will, we could reverse this, and we could go back to a time when defined benefit plans were on the increase. I do not think that is in the cards.
Oct 18, 2023
It takes guts to do that, and Chairman Arrington, you have certainly led the charge on having a commission.
Mar 3, 2021
I urge you to vote for the confirmation of Dave Turk. I urge you to do it quickly.
Apr 4, 2017
We did a whole series of things in our Social Security reform not to discourage people from working, but to encourage them to continue working if they are able to do so.





