This issue is simple. The question is, Are we going to have a reserve fund so that there is a solution to the tobacco controversy, that we can use the money in a way that accommodates every comprehensive bill that is before this body, introduced by Republicans or Democrats? Unfortunately, under the budget resolution, the money can only go for one purpose: Medicare. While that is an important priority, there are other priorities as well--smoking cessation, smoking prevention, health research, countertobacco advertising, easing the transition for farmers. We should not be creating supermajority hurdles in the way of tobacco legislation, and the only way we avoid that is to pass this amendment.
Kent Conrad: “This issue is simple. The question is, Are we going to have a reserve fund so that there is a solution to the tobacco…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a reserve fund to address tobacco legislation and related health priorities.
Share
More from Kent Conrad
Can I just respond quickly, Mr. Chairman, and say when Simpson-Bowles went down, a group of six of us in the Senate, three Democrats, three Republicans, were asked by leadership to see if we couldn't come up with a way forward to adopt the…
We tried to include some of these ideas in our Social Security reform package, to actually provide incentives in the system for people to continue to work.
This Retirement Security Plan structure that we have suggested I think would go a long way toward dealing with these issues.
We did a whole series of things in our Social Security reform not to discourage people from working, but to encourage them to continue working if they are able to do so.





