When we are at war, when our troops are in jeopardy, when they are in combat zones, when the Commander in Chief makes a request, we need to honor that request. Look, I believe we ought to pay for this increase. I believe we ought to offset it with either additional revenues or spending cuts in other areas because the deficit is at record levels now and this just increases it. We are seeing dramatic increases in the debt. Without that before us at the moment, the choice becomes do we increase the defense expenditure to meet the request of the Commander in Chief or do we not? I believe the imperative is clear. I believe we must raise the defense expenditure level to meet the request of the Commander in Chief when we have troops in combat half a world away fighting day and night for this country.
Kent Conrad: “When we are at war, when our troops are in jeopardy, when they are in combat zones, when the Commander in Chief makes a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing support for an amendment related to defense expenditure during wartime.
Share
More from Kent Conrad
This Retirement Security Plan structure that we have suggested I think would go a long way toward dealing with these issues.
If you are really going to relieve me of the administrative burden, if you are going to really relieve me of the liability, if you are going to really relieve me of the cost other than the payroll transfer.
We did a whole series of things in our Social Security reform not to discourage people from working, but to encourage them to continue working if they are able to do so.
We tried to include some of these ideas in our Social Security reform package, to actually provide incentives in the system for people to continue to work.





