On the recordOctober 10, 2007
The cost cited assumes that not a nickel is spent on IRS capacity. Indeed, if we spend it on IRS capacity, the unrefuted evidence is that it would be a 5-to-1 return relative to private collectors.
Source
govinfo.govEarl Pomeroy: “The cost cited assumes that not a nickel is spent on IRS capacity. Indeed, if we spend it on IRS capacity, the unrefuted…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the financial implications of IRS capacity versus private collectors.
Share
More from Earl Pomeroy
May 20, 2009
It is really on its face absurd. And I appreciate very much the leadership of this Committee in giving us these kinds of fora to have us sit in the sun and dissect it a little bit.
Feb 1, 2012
In May 2010, Senator Casey introduced S. 3157 under the title of Create Jobs and Save Benefits Act of 2010.
Feb 9, 2010
The thing that really gets me about all the work we've done is we have another lake rise of 2-3 feet bringing a new host of problems that only get more difficult.
Other voices in this conversation
