Mr. Speaker, I represent the State of North Dakota. I represent more production acres of agriculture than any other Member of the House of Representatives. My, my, my, I have not heard so much concern about our family farmers in four terms in this Congress than I am hearing in the course of this debate. The fact of the matter is, it is time for a little truth in advertising. This bill is not about family farms, this bill is about tax relief for the wealthiest few in this country. Let us just take a look at the numbers to put this in perspective. Of taxable estates, those containing farm assets from 1995, 1996, and 1997 represented one-tenth of 1 percent of the taxable estates. That was before the increase, and a significant increase, bringing it to a $2.6 million unified credit today. It is time we raised that credit. If indeed that is the situation, even for a few family farms, let us address it and let us address it right now. The majority bill does not do that.
Earl Pomeroy: “Mr. Speaker, I represent the State of North Dakota. I represent more production acres of agriculture than any other…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about tax relief and its impact on family farms during a House debate.
Share
More from Earl Pomeroy
I thank the gentleman for yielding and commend him so much for the leadership he has shown on budget matters. Receiving fiscal lectures from this crowd is a little bit like getting investment advice from Bernie Madoff. You know, when…
I am happy to report the water in the Red River continues to go down, and it looks like this heroic community-wide effort put forward by Fargo, in putting 43 miles of temporary dike in place, will have largely saved the city.
I believe that when it is a securitized issue spread around with no remote concept of insurable interest, you raise profound questions about whether or not this tax incentive ought to apply anymore.





