On the recordSeptember 25, 1998
on the issue before us, this Congress stands at a very important crossroads: Do we go down the easy path of dissipating the Social Security surplus on election year gimmicks like this proposed tax cut, or do we brace ourselves for the tough march that lies ahead to secure Social Security, to address the long-term solvency problem in Social Security so it will work as well for our grandchildren as it has worked for our parents and grandparents? It is a critical question. Dissipating Social Security trust funds makes our problem worse. We already have bills before this session that would require someone to work until they are 70 years old before they would get their Social Security payment, or that would raise the tax on Social Security, making wage-earners pay even more into Social Security. Both of these measures are to fill the solvency hole we already have. Mr. Speaker, a tax cut on the Social Security surplus would only make the problem worse. The question before us is one most of us have never faced before, the first surplus we have seen in 30 years. Let us hold the Social Security surplus for Social Security. Pass the Rangel substitute.
Source
govinfo.gov




