I would only conclude by saying that is precisely correct. The Wise-Price-Pomeroy-Furse amendment is not a sham. It is not saying, ``We do not want a balanced-budget amendment, but, wink, wink, we will vote for this one, great cover.'' This is a better balanced-budget amendment. The debate is not about whether we ought to have a balanced-budget amendment, as far as I am concerned. I agree with those of you who for so long have contended that was an essential step needed by the country at this point in time. How best do we do it? I believe the proposal we are offering does represent the best way to tackle this problem.
On the recordMarch 16, 1994
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the merits of the Wise-Price-Pomeroy-Furse amendment during a debate on a balanced-budget amendment.
Share
More from Earl Pomeroy
Sep 16, 2009
I believe that when it is a securitized issue spread around with no remote concept of insurable interest, you raise profound questions about whether or not this tax incentive ought to apply anymore.
May 20, 2009
I respectfully request to submit the following letter to the record from the Bank of North Dakota for the hearing the Education and Labor committee held on May 21, 2009.
Mar 31, 2009
I am happy to report the water in the Red River continues to go down, and it looks like this heroic community-wide effort put forward by Fargo, in putting 43 miles of temporary dike in place, will have largely saved the city.





