They said we could not afford it. We could not afford to take a family making $30,000 trying to save for retirement, we could not give them a tax cut. So that if they get $2,000 into an IRA, we give them a tax credit of $1,000, representing essentially a 50 percent match on their contribution. There is no better savings incentive than an employer match through this tax cut to middle income families. We could essentially give them an Uncle Sam match, helping them save for retirement. I cannot think of anything more important than helping middle income families save for retirement. That is what ought to be the priority. We need to help people save for their later years before we get around to aiding Bill Gates with his estate dilemma.
Earl Pomeroy: “They said we could not afford it. We could not afford to take a family making $30,000 trying to save for retirement, we…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of tax cuts for middle-income families saving for retirement.
Share
More from Earl Pomeroy
I have enormous respect for each of the speakers, my friends, on the other side. I think they have made their points well. But I would like us to come back to really what's at stake with the issue in front of us. Essentially, we want to…
this notion that the way we have been doing trade is the way we will do trade going forward, bring on the next trade deal, would be a very erroneous notion.
Last week, former Congressman Arthur A. Link who served in the 92nd Congress passed away. One week earlier, he celebrated his 96th birthday and 71st wedding anniversary with his beloved wife, Grace. Mr. Link held elected office in North…
In the end, and over the years, we would have people at this table lauding the innovation occurring in the financial services marketplace, how it enhanced liquidity of our markets, how it allowed our economy to grow.





