Well, I can only speak for the comments the gentleman quoted from my own debate. And what I was so happy about the 2002 bill is we were restoring a safety net for farmers when prices collapsed. During the earlier farm bill, known as Freedom to Farm, that protection had been taken away and we had to resort to ad hoc disaster bills when the prices collapsed. We took care of that in the last firm bill and we have not had a disaster bill on that since. This disaster bill relates to production loss. And we're always going to have disasters in our country that bedevil some of our farmers relative to disaster dimension losses. We put them in the budget. We specify in tight reform language how the losses would be compensated. And we think it's good budgeting.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of the 2002 farm bill in providing a safety net for farmers.
Share
More from Earl Pomeroy
I am here to talk about the cell phone provision of this bill. I am pleased to work with my friend, Sam Johnson, on the other side of the aisle in addressing what really is an anachronism in the Tax Code. Maybe at the time this technology…
this notion that the way we have been doing trade is the way we will do trade going forward, bring on the next trade deal, would be a very erroneous notion.
In May 2010, Senator Casey introduced S. 3157 under the title of Create Jobs and Save Benefits Act of 2010.
It is really on its face absurd. And I appreciate very much the leadership of this Committee in giving us these kinds of fora to have us sit in the sun and dissect it a little bit.





