the fate of hundreds of sugar beet farmers that I represent and hundreds of millions of workers that I represent turn on this debate. But it is not their interests I want to talk to Members about. I want to talk to Members about our balance of trade problem as the United States of America. We import more than we export to the tune of $32 billion in 1992, $73 billion in 1993, $110 billion in 1994, and $114 billion last year. Sugar is one ag commodity where domestic consumption is greater than our production. Why in the world would we want to blow up a domestic program, which this amendment would do, which would destroy domestic production and make us import more sugar than is presently the case? The only thing favorable in our balance of trade is essentially agriculture and airplanes. Foreign countries must look at us like we are crazy. We look at something that contributes so positively to our balance of trade and we want to threaten it in the way this amendment does tonight. I urge Members to vote no.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the impact of trade policy on sugar beet farmers and the U.S. balance of trade.
Share
More from Earl Pomeroy
Earlier this year, I introduced a bill with my friend, the ranking member on the Social Security Subcommittee, Sam Johnson, to protect the accuracy of Social Security records and help shield individuals from identity theft. Our bill…
We want this base used, and used actively. It has a long history of playing an important role in our Nation's defense structure.
Helping North Dakota business create jobs is my top priority and today, Madam Speaker, Congress takes another step forward with a sharp focus on small businesses. Small businesses are a proven engine of job creation. During the last…
I just want to begin, Mr. Chairman, by thanking you for this hearing and commend this panel in particular.





