I have in my hand the Congressional Record of the consideration of the rules from the preceding farm bills back to 1965. By my reading, none has been considered under a rule as restrictive as the one considered today. Second, your statistics about whatever number of rules are open versus closed is of no consequences to North Dakota, when the farm bill is up under a closed rule. Agriculture in North Dakota is better than half of our economy. This is the big kahuna. This is the most important legislation that this body will consider relative to my State, and you have not allowed me to offer an important alternative to the freedom to farm bill. We deserve better, Mr. Speaker. I hope my colleagues vote down this rule.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the restrictive rules surrounding the farm bill during a floor debate.
Share
More from Earl Pomeroy
In May 2010, Senator Casey introduced S. 3157 under the title of Create Jobs and Save Benefits Act of 2010.
I believe that when it is a securitized issue spread around with no remote concept of insurable interest, you raise profound questions about whether or not this tax incentive ought to apply anymore.
I thank the gentleman for yielding and commend him so much for the leadership he has shown on budget matters. Receiving fiscal lectures from this crowd is a little bit like getting investment advice from Bernie Madoff. You know, when…
Earlier this year, I introduced a bill with my friend, the ranking member on the Social Security Subcommittee, Sam Johnson, to protect the accuracy of Social Security records and help shield individuals from identity theft. Our bill…





