Mr. Chairman, Medicare select is an issue I have followed for several years. I am the only former insurance regulator in the 104th Congress. At the time the Medicare Select Program came into being, I was regulating the insurance market in North Dakota, the State I now represent in this body. I favored very strongly the Medicare select component. I thought perhaps the 15-State limitation at that time was unduly restrictive, in light of fairly prevalent practices throughout the Medicare supplement market at that time to allow the type of discounting and favorable premium impact it had for the senior citizen consumers under the operation explicitly allowed for the 15 States under the program. I believe with the Medicare select, those who would believe we are engaged in an experiment here have it exactly wrong. The Medicare select restrictions actually constricted discounting activity that was allowing seniors lower insurance prices throughout the 50 States. I fought as an insurance regulator to make sure North Dakota got to be one of the 15 States allowed, and was pleased that the Department of Health and Human Services allowed North Dakota to be one of the States. The experience has been significant. It has allowed a 17-percent premium deduction for senior citizens.
On the recordApril 6, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the Medicare Select Program and its impact on insurance premiums for seniors.
Share
More from Earl Pomeroy
May 14, 2008
Mr. Speaker, the pride I want to express is, as being a member of the Agriculture Committee, which I also serve on, a day like today makes me especially proud of that membership because what is before us is a collaborative product, the…
Dec 16, 2010
For the last five sessions I have worked to try and clarify the rate of estate taxation in this country. I felt the right approach was ultimately to take the 2009 levels and make them permanent. The amendment that carries my name in this…
May 13, 2009
this notion that the way we have been doing trade is the way we will do trade going forward, bring on the next trade deal, would be a very erroneous notion.





