as a Member of this body, all too often, I have seen debates involve pressing problems and yet no real solutions, no meaningful answers. I am dumbfounded at this debate today, because we are dealing with no meaningful problem, and certainly just a sham of a solution. Mr. Chairman, I have 3 minutes left, and I would yield to any Member of the majority side in support of this bill that can show me in the interpretive bulletin where the language is that would diminish in any way, in any way, once scintilla, one little bit, the standards of risk or standards of return that would jeopardize the pension funds in the way that have been outlined.
On the recordSeptember 12, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Criticizing a bill related to pension fund standards during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Earl Pomeroy
Feb 4, 2009
A great country holds the interests of its children first and foremost. A great country responds to tough times and steep challenges by placing the interests of its children at the head of the line when it comes to advancing measures to…
May 27, 2010
I rise in support of amendment No. 23, which reauthorizes the Joint Family Support Assistance Program. This program has been providing critical support to the unsung heroes of the global war on terror, the families left behind of deploying…
May 20, 2009
I believe the Bank of North Dakota's insights will significantly contribute to this hearing.





