in April, seven colleagues and I wrote to you to express our serious concern that the number of long-range bombers contained in the fiscal year 1995 defense budget is inadequate to support requirements for two major regional contingencies. Specifically, we are troubled by the dramatic cut in our most capable and our only battle-tested bomber--the B-52H--to just 40 operational aircraft. Mr. Chairman, I understand that the committee responded to the shortfall in funding for long-range bombers by creating a Bomber Force Upgrade Fund [B-FUP]. Is it correct that the funds provided in the B-FUP may be used to retain B-52's in the active force instead of placing them in attrition reserve status, as proposed in the administration's budget?
Earl Pomeroy: “in April, seven colleagues and I wrote to you to express our serious concern that the number of long-range bombers…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the adequacy of long-range bombers in the fiscal year 1995 defense budget.
Share
More from Earl Pomeroy
In the end, and over the years, we would have people at this table lauding the innovation occurring in the financial services marketplace, how it enhanced liquidity of our markets, how it allowed our economy to grow.
we are in the midst of a global food crisis. Rising food prices are negatively affecting the world's poorest people, who frequently spend 80 percent of their income on food. As a result, the world's most vulnerable populations, including…
I believe that when it is a securitized issue spread around with no remote concept of insurable interest, you raise profound questions about whether or not this tax incentive ought to apply anymore.





