Mr. Speaker, I am very astounded the other side would suggest that the cost of our package is more than their package. The 10-year figure makes it very clear. The cost of our package is $5 billion. And we had that offset, although the offset was not allowed under the rule, but $5 billion. The cost of their package over the 10 years, $99 billion. When they talk about a 5-year cost figure, that is not but half the story. The full story is the 10-year figure, $99 billion for the majority, $5 billion for ours, and that does not exclude the next 10 years where theirs balloons to over a trillion dollars if you count death service. Whatever merit there may be to their arguments, and frankly they are pretty thin, it certainly has nothing to do about cost. Their package is, over the long run, is infinitely more expensive than ours.
On the recordJune 6, 2002
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the cost comparison between two legislative packages during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Earl Pomeroy
Feb 4, 2009
A great country holds the interests of its children first and foremost. A great country responds to tough times and steep challenges by placing the interests of its children at the head of the line when it comes to advancing measures to…
May 7, 2008
Mr. Speaker, the point of the farm bill at issue with this motion deals with a concept of public interest. Will private land adjacent to forest land be protected or will it be sold off and developed into very nice, very expensive private…





