But you cannot describe in the conference report what the language means. The language means what it says it means. My question, first, is, when this language left the Senate, did it mean that utilities were excluded from the definition of products? I thought it meant that. Most Members of the Senate thought it meant that. That is what I think it says. Do you believe that is what it says?
Discussing the interpretation of language in a conference report regarding utilities and product definitions.
Share
More from Byron Dorgan
The fundamental problem found in the Dorgan report in 2010 and the findings now before the House is IHS, LEADERSHIP was failing then as it is failing now.
It is a travesty! Further, it is a problem that will continue to have negative impacts for generations to come.
What you and members of this Committee can do and will do by putting the spotlight on this spot will save lives.
Other voices in this conversation
