Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. We still haven't heard an explanation for why this legislation deems it appropriate to eliminate arbitration for parties of all sizes. We keep hearing about the little guy versus the massive corporation. Even in that circumstance, of course, what we may be talking about is like the case from 2011, AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, where the issue was people in California had bought cell phones, they had been offered a free cell phone, but it wasn't made clear that they would have to pay the sales tax. So there was a $5 claim per purchaser, and wealthy plaintiffs' class- action lawyers wanted to bring a big lawsuit. With tens of thousands of them, they might get a $5 coupon, but the lawyers would buy a new jet. That may be in some circumstances, even the dispute with the big guy. But leave that aside. We still don't hear any explanation for why you are wiping out arbitration as a means that parties choose, even if they are on equal bargaining power. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Tiffany).
Share & report
More from Dan Bishop
Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from California (Mr. McClintock), the chairman of the Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration Integrity, Security, and Enforcement. Mr. McCLINTOCK. Mr. Speaker, Laken Riley's death was…
Madam Speaker, many have said what the issue is. Many have mischaracterized it, in my judgment. The issue presented by the Articles of Impeachment and why they should be adopted by the House is not a matter of policy, it is not a matter of…
The Government cannot simply sidestep the Constitution by outsourcing censorship under the guise of protecting critical infrastructure.
If the allegations made by the plaintiffs are true, the present case arguably involves the most massive attack on free speech in United States history.





