Political Quotes

On the recordApril 12, 2024
Mr. Chair, the Crenshaw amendment would expand FISA's definition of foreign intelligence to encompass international drug crimes. FISA is a counterintelligence and counterterrorism tool. It is limited to that purpose. The clear distinction between foreign intelligence and crime are essential to preserving the fundamental liberties of Americans under our constitutional system. {time} 1130 It is the essential design of the law: spying abroad, criminal justice at home. Simply redefining foreign intelligence to include ordinary crime eviscerates the entire distinction on which the design of the FISA law rests. Moreover, the Intelligence Committee proponents of this amendment fail even to explain to us why this blurred definition is needed. They assert it, but they don't explain it. After all, the DNI's FISA section 702 fact sheet lists the government's use of section 702 to learn about our adversaries' plans to smuggle fentanyl into the United States as the number one successful use of existing section 702. If section 702 already allows us to go after fentanyl, then why do we need to change and blur the critical definition of foreign intelligence? What is the purpose of doing so? What comes next? Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman has the only time remaining.
Said by
Dan Bishop
Republican · North Carolina

Share & report

More from Dan Bishop

Dec 11, 2023

It does seem to me that while we can help treat symptoms by doing more information sharing and task force and resource provision, if we've caused a lot of the problem by not sufficiently backing law enforcement.

congress.gov
Jan 29, 2024

The Federal Government has turned their guns against us and used their resources to sue the State of Texas for defending itself.

congress.gov
Feb 5, 2024

One of the things interesting about this process, the weaponization hearings to me, is the number of witnesses that I've understood at least have some political origin on the left who've been before this Committee.

congress.gov
Dec 12, 2023

The Government's power to censor speech... must be strictly limited to content that is not Constitutionally-protected.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation