If, in the extremely unlikely event that a false claim of substantial investment is actually made by a generic competitor coming into the marketplace, the court may award damages in full, plus interest. If for some reason the court felt particularly strongly that the claim of substantial investment was false, fraudulent or otherwise inappropriate, it has further discretion to award treble damages to the patent holder.
Discussing potential damages related to false claims by generic competitors under patent law.
Share
More from William Pryor
Yes, it is. Compliance with proposition 65's warning requirements would only complement the CPSC Reform Act.
As a former State attorney general and the ranking member of the Commerce Committee's Consumer Affairs, Product Safety, and Insurance Subcommittee, I have significant concerns with this approach. I believe the amendment proposes a…
No. First, the CPSC Reform Act bans lead in children's products beyond trace amounts. Under section 22, any children's product that contains lead ``shall be treated as a banned hazardous substance under the Federal Hazardous Substances…
Whatever the chief of staff's role with respect to state election administration does not include altering valid election results.