also, let me state that in this New Yorker magazine, dated April 22, I believe--I do not have my glasses with me-- there is a splendid article entitled ``How Independent Is the Counsel,'' once again, talking about the conflicts, talking about the image that this man who is burdened with these conflicts presents as he is attempting to portray that he is fair-minded, objective, and impartial in finding all the facts. It is time, Mr. President, that, once again, we sort of set this ship straight, if I might say that. It is time that we move forward with a fair determination of the facts and finding of the facts. I hope the committee will proceed expeditiously. But had I had the opportunity to vote, if it were a matter before this body that required a yes or no vote, I would have voted ``no.''
William Pryor: “also, let me state that in this New Yorker magazine, dated April 22, I believe--I do not have my glasses with me-- there…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the independence of the counsel and the need for a fair determination of facts.
Share
More from William Pryor
In reflection of the New Year, I have thought about what I wanted my New Year's resolution to be. I had a wonderful holiday that I was fortunate to spend with my family, and I thought about those in the world who did not have that same…
I want to pause for 1 minute and thank all of the cosponsors on this legislation. There was a committee bill and the bill that passed the floor a few moments ago. I thank everybody who helped work on this, even those who voted against it…
Roe v. Wade was the, 'worst abomination in the history of constitutional law.'
I didn't intend to say anything about our friend, Ken Salazar today, but in listening to his remarks and knowing the contribution he has made around here in 4 short years, I couldn't resist. I first met Senator Salazar before he was a…