the sponsors of this ``Paycheck Reduction Act'' keep claiming that H.R. 1 uses the same ``unduly disrupt'' standard found in the Family and Medical Leave Act. Their claim is flat, dead wrong. Let's set the record straight. Under the FMLA, the ``unduly disrupt'' standard is extremely limited and specifically protects the power of employees to decide for themselves when to take family leave. Under the FMLA, the ``unduly disrupt'' exception only applies when the need for leave is for forseeable medical reasons. In that case, the FMLA says, ``The employee shall make a reasonable effort to schedule the leave so as not to disrupt unduly the employer's operation.'' Even then, the leave can only be delayed if the employee's doctor agrees that delay will not harm the health of the employee, or his or her family member. That distinction lies at the heart of the difference between the Republican bill and the Democratic substitute. We protect the employees' power over their own time and pay. H.R. 1, on the other hand, gives more power to the employees.
William L. Clay: “the sponsors of this ``Paycheck Reduction Act'' keep claiming that H.R. 1 uses the same ``unduly disrupt'' standard…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the differences between the Paycheck Reduction Act and the Family and Medical Leave Act.
Share
More from William L. Clay
I would be suspect of White supremacist police officers, but their ideology was a First Amendment protected right.
I did not think it was possible for the majority to exceed their unprecedented arrogant abuse of official channels and Federal funds that we have witnessed over the past 2 years as they have engaged in a partisan political witch hunt at…
I fully expect HUD to follow through on any and all commitments made and work with my staff and me to ensure that the residents have access to affordable housing.
Dodd-Frank focused on restoring reasonable safeguards to better protect consumers from the kind of predatory lending that hurt so many people just a few years ago.