the majority must have some serious misgivings about title I of its own bill. Earlier this week, the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Fawell), chairman of the subcommittee, prefiled and then withdrew an amendment to strike title I from the bill. Now the gentleman from Pennsylvania is trying to salvage this extreme and reckless title through this amendment. The truth is this amendment does nothing to fix this bill. It merely restates the current law protections while still allowing employers to refuse employment to workers, based on the outside group affiliations. I have no intentions of opposing the amendment because it does nothing.
William L. Clay: “the majority must have some serious misgivings about title I of its own bill. Earlier this week, the gentleman from…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about Title I of a bill during a House floor debate.
Share
More from William L. Clay
Dodd-Frank focused on restoring reasonable safeguards to better protect consumers from the kind of predatory lending that hurt so many people just a few years ago.
Removing credit scores in assessment of risk will not resolve Michigan's self-imposed affordability problems.
I did not think it was possible for the majority to exceed their unprecedented arrogant abuse of official channels and Federal funds that we have witnessed over the past 2 years as they have engaged in a partisan political witch hunt at…
At the end of the day, all of America benefits when our financial system ensures that access to responsible credit is nondiscriminatory, transparent and safe for business and individual consumers.