the budget spends $88 billion over 5 years on ineffective programs and raises taxes by $900 billion to do so. My amendment reduces spending by 25 percent on programs rated ineffective by OMB's program assessment rating tool. PART has evaluated almost 1,000 programs accounting for 96 percent of all Federal spending. Only 26 are rated ineffective in discretionary spending. Chairman Conrad will say the budget resolution cannot tell appropriators how to implement the savings. My amendment simply allows the appropriators, with a great deal of flexibility, to find those savings that are proven to exist. It also tells agencies we expect results from programs we fund. If my colleagues vote for this amendment, we will save the taxpayers $18 billion over 5 years and pay down the Federal debt by $18 billion. I believe if we cannot trim $4 billion out of a $2.9 trillion budget on ineffective programs, we cannot honestly tell taxpayers we are serious about fiscal responsibility. I urge my colleagues to support the amendment.
Wayne Allard: “the budget spends $88 billion over 5 years on ineffective programs and raises taxes by $900 billion to do so. My…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing budget spending and proposing an amendment to reduce ineffective program funding.
Share
More from Wayne Allard
In 2005, I worked closely with my colleagues in the House and in the Senate on provisions which were included in section 369 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. These will help lead to commercialization after the research and demonstration…
I hope we can move this legislation, so that the 50,000 riders that enjoyed the Clear Creek Management Area in 2003 can do so again in 2014.
the IRS new guidance would force the AMA either to muzzle its advocacy efforts or lose its status as a tax-exempt organization.
There shouldn't be any concern because we are a social welfare organization. We are prohibited from being partisan in our activity.