The amendment cuts funds which would require termination of the program, plain and simple. DOD has repeatedly reviewed that very question. Each time they have concluded we need 53 additional missiles. Keep in mind, the goal originally was set up that we needed to maintain a submarine force in the Pacific Ocean as well as the Atlantic Ocean. It was determined that, at a minimum, we had to have 14 submarines, and we needed to have them adequately armed in order to provide the defenses we need. The Trident submarine is the core of the U.S. strategic deterrent force, and the Trident force is the most survivable leg of our strategic triad. I think it is important we go ahead and complete this program, recognizing that we are towards the end of manufacturing of the missiles. I think it only makes sense that we complete it and maintain a strong defense. I believe a strong defense does serve as a deterrent, and it helps assure world peace. For that reason, I strongly oppose the amendment of the Senator from Wisconsin.
Wayne Allard: “The amendment cuts funds which would require termination of the program, plain and simple. DOD has repeatedly reviewed…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment that would cut funding for missile programs during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Wayne Allard
The key for the AMA and our members is that E15 must be proven safe for motorcycle and ATV engines.
this is a new process. I thank the Senator from New Mexico for his question. This process is becoming economically feasible and certainly protects the environment. I know the Senator has been working hard on this particular issue on the…
one of my goals for this debate is to fight what I see as an erosion of fiscal discipline in the budget. I have offered an amendment to fully--I planned on offering an amendment to fully budget for the war, a war we know we are going to…
I hope we can move this legislation, so that the 50,000 riders that enjoyed the Clear Creek Management Area in 2003 can do so again in 2014.