We are sorry it is denominated the Labor party, because it should be something more than a Labor party, and because this is a direct challenge to capital, and it will very probably result in arraying these two interests in an antagonism which will be but a repetition of the slavery antagonism.
Woodhull critiques the Labor party for potentially fostering conflict between labor and capital interests.
Share
More from Victoria C. Woodhull
How has it been possible thus long for leaders to control the masses, except that the masses have permitted others to act for them, and that without rendering any account for such action?
Why do they advocate any general government at all?
If he will not labor, society should compel him.
To do so carries no conviction nor prophetic knowledge of what must be next, as a necessary sequence.