When this is considered in its true light, we come to a realization that gold is no more money, absolutely, than any other of the different products of the earth, but with them all it forms the real value standard.
Victoria C. Woodhull: “When this is considered in its true light, we come to a realization that gold is no more money, absolutely, than any…”
Editor's note · Context
Woodhull argues that gold should not be viewed as the sole form of money, but rather as part of a broader standard of value.
Share
More from Victoria C. Woodhull
Can mouldering relics, or can fossiled creeds, Provide the quickening age her mighty needs?
Gold is relatively valuable for the general uses it can be made to subserve; so, too, and only so, are all other products.
I have deliberately and of my own accord placed myself before the people as a candidate for the Presidency of the United States, and having the means, courage, energy and strength necessary for the race, intend to contest it to the close.
That kind of money which has elasticity, that will be plenty when business is active, and that can be readily put to other use for profit when business is less demanding, is the kind the prosperity of a country demands.