originally I had thought that at this point the Senate would grant a unanimous consent that would in effect make null and void the precedent set in March of 1995 with respect to legislation on an appropriations bill. Having spoken with the Democratic leader, we both feel, now, that the Senate would be better served by conducting a rollcall vote that would overturn the precedent. Needless to say, this vote would occur at the first opportunity the Senate has during the appropriations process this year, at least we think that would be the appropriate time for it to occur. The Democratic leader has indicated to me that he would support such an action in the early summer of this year as we begin the appropriations process, and I look forward to his cooperation at that time, when we have the vote which would reinstate the point of order with respect to legislation on an appropriations bill. I believe, and I think the Democratic leader would agree, that the process has been abused in recent months.
Trent Lott: “originally I had thought that at this point the Senate would grant a unanimous consent that would in effect make null…”
On the recordJanuary 7, 1997
Said by
Trent Lott
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a rollcall vote to overturn a precedent regarding appropriations legislation.
Share
More from Trent Lott
Dec 18, 2007
I can't help but feel honored and humbled by all that has been said here. My mother would have loved it and would have believed it all. I feel totally inadequate to properly respond to much of what has been said. I thank my colleagues one…
Dec 4, 2012
I think if they would go back to the old way of getting things done, carefully and systematically, would really help them.
Oct 24, 2007
we are working on when we are going to be able to get this up. I have a couple of points. One, we have a catch- 22. Our Members want to make sure they have a chance to offer amendments, and we want to do that. At the same time, our…