I also had hoped that we would be able to work out an agreement where there wouldn't be objection to my motion to proceed to the Birth Defects Prevention Act--this is broadly supported legislation; I don't see how there could be objection to it--while we continue to work to find ways to move other legislation while committees are meeting. I understand the pressure that Senators feel on both sides of the aisle on other issues, but I don't see why that should cause us to halt or prevent us from taking up a very noncontroversial, broadly bipartisan supported legislation like S. 419. Let us be clear about what this legislation does, the birth defects legislation. No one in this body needs to be told that birth defects are the leading cause of infant mortality in this country. They are directly responsible for one 1 of every 5 infant deaths. Here is a chance to do something about that, not in a week, not in a month, but this afternoon with, I am sure, not very long debate but enough debate so that the issue can be properly addressed.
Trent Lott: “I also had hoped that we would be able to work out an agreement where there wouldn't be objection to my motion to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Birth Defects Prevention Act and urging for its timely consideration.
Share
More from Trent Lott
We do not filibuster judges. And if we were to do that, we would change the culture of this place.
However, like so many of the things that we complain about in the Congress, we looked around, and we found the enemy, and it is us.
The amendment would modify the bill's competition pilot program to allow an unlimited number of existing Amtrak routes to be open to competition from freight rails that seek to operate passenger trains in exchange for Amtrak's current…
I wish to acknowledge the Senator's kind remarks. It was a pleasure working with him on this legislation. It has been a long time coming. I appreciate the active involvement he has had, along with other Senators on both sides of the aisle…