This issue of the marriage tax penalty is clear and understandable: Are Members for it or against it? I fear my colleagues on the Democratic side are trying to change the subject. I cannot believe they don't want to eliminate the marriage tax penalty. Let's have a full debate, let's have amendments on the marriage penalty. But to get off into every other possible issue as a way to try to distract attention from doing what the American people support overwhelmingly, I don't understand that. I think what we are trying to do makes good, common sense. Let's have a full debate on the issue. Let's have relevant amendments.
Trent Lott: “This issue of the marriage tax penalty is clear and understandable: Are Members for it or against it? I fear my…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the marriage tax penalty and the need for a focused debate on the issue.
Share
More from Trent Lott
I also think this is a classic chicken-and-egg deal. We tell Amtrak we want them to do better, but yet we don't offer any reforms, challenges, responsibilities to do better. We throw rocks and say: Why aren't you providing better service…
I wish to acknowledge the Senator's kind remarks. It was a pleasure working with him on this legislation. It has been a long time coming. I appreciate the active involvement he has had, along with other Senators on both sides of the aisle…
I was accused of being a compromiser or a deal-maker. I didn't know those were dirty words.
My recommendation to the Congress and to the president would be, quit campaigning, quit having press conferences. Sit down at a round table and negotiate a deal.