I would be amazed if the President of the United States would veto this bill after it has gone through the House and the Senate, supported by Senators from the diverse States I named, all the way from Minnesota, Idaho, Vermont, New Hampshire, my own State, and perhaps others. But, if the Congress gets to the point where, just because of the mere threat from the President of a veto, we do not act, we might as well go ahead and leave now for the year because he is talking about vetoing every bill that is moving. I do not think we can use that as a basis of not acting on important legislation.
Trent Lott: “I would be amazed if the President of the United States would veto this bill after it has gone through the House and the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the potential presidential veto of a bill during Senate debate.
Share
More from Trent Lott
I have argued we should not filibuster Federal judges. One time when I sat in that seat as majority leader, my colleagues actually voted to filibuster a judge and opposed cloture. Senator Hatch and I took to the floor and said we are not…
I do think that the congestion problem is going to continue to grow until we begin to make tougher decisions.
You've got to do that every now and then. Even though you might get your little flak from some of the people within your conference. It's called leadership.
Judge Southwick was awarded the Judicial Excellence Award by the Mississippi State Bar Association, and he was rated not just well qualified but unanimously well qualified by the American Bar Association. This is supposed to be the gold…