I disagreed with those who see something ominous or irregular in what is sometimes called the religious right. These are, in fact, good people who are rightly concerned about the security of their homes, the safety of their children, and the future of family life in America. Both parties need the participation of people like that. Moral and ethical concerns should not be the singular property of either party. That is what I was trying to convey in my comments concerning religious Americans and the Democratic Party. I meant to express the hope that our fellow citizens, whose religious beliefs lead them to advocate school prayer, engage in home-schooling, or oppose abortion, could feel equally at home on either side of the political fence.
Trent Lott: “I disagreed with those who see something ominous or irregular in what is sometimes called the religious right. These…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the role of religious groups in politics and the need for bipartisan participation.
Share
More from Trent Lott
I have argued we should not filibuster Federal judges. One time when I sat in that seat as majority leader, my colleagues actually voted to filibuster a judge and opposed cloture. Senator Hatch and I took to the floor and said we are not…
You've got to do that every now and then. Even though you might get your little flak from some of the people within your conference. It's called leadership.
We are going to start doing things a little differently. We are going to go back and do some of the things that worked.
I can't help but feel honored and humbled by all that has been said here. My mother would have loved it and would have believed it all. I feel totally inadequate to properly respond to much of what has been said. I thank my colleagues one…