Without getting into the substance or without questioning anybody's motives, it is important that we understand--and I can put this in the form of a question to the majority leader--if, in fact, this appeal of the ruling of the Chair should succeed, that would do away with rule XVI, as I understand it, and then we would all have a grand old time legislating on appropriations bills. But here is part of my concern, honestly. I don't think we can win that battle against the other side. I suspect you all would wind up legislating more than we would on appropriations bills. Mr. President, I think we need to calm down around here. There is a rule on the books for a reason. For good reason we took an action that knocked it out a few years ago. I learned painfully what a mistake that was. We should not be legislating on appropriations bills. I think this action would cause some consequences we would not want, if we look at it in the future.
Trent Lott: “Without getting into the substance or without questioning anybody's motives, it is important that we understand--and I…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a ruling related to appropriations bills and legislative rules.
Share
More from Trent Lott
Senator Lautenberg is here, chairman of the subcommittee. He is working with Senator Murray on a couple amendments. We have a couple amendments by Senator DeMint that we have cleared. We are hoping we will have a chance to visit with…
We do not filibuster judges. And if we were to do that, we would change the culture of this place.
Regarding the Amtrak legislation, work was done on Friday and it is being worked on now by our staffs. We had additional amendments that were filed this afternoon and we are going through them. In the meantime, we have cleared on both…
The amendment would modify the bill's competition pilot program to allow an unlimited number of existing Amtrak routes to be open to competition from freight rails that seek to operate passenger trains in exchange for Amtrak's current…