I do sincerely hope that we can produce a result that will provide prescription drug coverage for our low-income elderly, sick people who need this help. My concern, though, is we do it in such a way that the costs are not so extreme that they wind up causing serious problems with our Medicare funds. In short, we don't want to blow a hole in the Medicare fund and cause all kinds of problems as a result of our good intentions. That is my first concern with the Graham-Kennedy proposal. I know it has been difficult to get a cost analysis. I am still not quite sure exactly what the cost has been estimated on this proposal, although I understand it is in the range of $600 billion over a 10-year period. The other thing that bothers me is the universal coverage aspects. Regardless of income, you are going to get subsidized prescription drugs if you are, I guess, in a certain age category.
Trent Lott: “I do sincerely hope that we can produce a result that will provide prescription drug coverage for our low-income…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about the cost and implications of the Graham-Kennedy prescription drug proposal.
Share
More from Trent Lott
A lot of it is because Republicans when they start talking don't talk about education. You have to talk about it. You have to go there, where they are.
But, unfortunately, the wheels have come off in the Finance Committee, in the House, in trying to find a way to come together in a bipartisan, nonpartisan way.
I wish to make some opening comments about what happened here and make a plea to my colleagues on both sides of the aisle, but particularly my own side of the aisle, that we not object to going to consideration of Amtrak legislation. I…
we are working on when we are going to be able to get this up. I have a couple of points. One, we have a catch- 22. Our Members want to make sure they have a chance to offer amendments, and we want to do that. At the same time, our…