No better reason can be given, why a house of legislation should be composed entirely of men whose occupation consists in letting landed property, than why it should be composed of those who hire, or of brewers, or bakers, or any other separate class of men.
From his work "Rights of Man," Paine argues against the exclusive representation of landed property owners in government.
Share
More from Thomas Paine
He must now show that every one in the line of hereditary succession was a Solomon, or his title is not good to be a king.
In fine, society performs for itself almost everything which is ascribed to government.
The Aristocracy had hitherto opposed the despotism of the Court, and affected the language of patriotism; but it opposed it as its rival (as the English Barons opposed King John) and it now opposed the nation from the same motives.
The animosity of the English nation, it is very well remembered, ran high; and, had the true principles of Liberty been as well understood then as they now promise to be, it is probable the Nation would not have patiently submitted to so…