The happiness of a nation is the superior object, and therefore the intention of an oath of allegiance ought not to be obscured by being figuratively taken, to, or in the name of, any person.
Thomas Paine: “The happiness of a nation is the superior object, and therefore the intention of an oath of allegiance ought not to be…”
Editor's note · Context
Paine argues that the primary goal of government is national happiness, and oaths of allegiance should reflect this rather than being directed towards an individual.
Share
More from Thomas Paine
The thing, in many points, contained better principles than those upon which the Government had hitherto been administered; but with respect to the Cour Pleniere, it was no other than a medium through which despotism was to pass, without…
The aristocracy has screened itself too much, and this serves to restore a part of the lost equilibrium.
It was become evident, that no constitution, worthy of being called by that name, could be established on anything less than a national ground.
They had a cause at stake, on which depended their freedom or their slavery.