On the recordMarch 29, 2023
It would mean 84,000 farmers couldn't access the technical assistance they need to embrace conservation practices.
Said by
Thomas J. Vilsack
Source
congress.govIt would mean 84,000 farmers couldn't access the technical assistance they need to embrace conservation practices.
Emphasizing the negative effects of budget cuts on farmers' access to assistance.
Share
More from Thomas J. Vilsack
This budget is at a critical point, at a transformational point, in my view, in rural America, and in agriculture.
investments in research that create new opportunities; new income opportunities, is a way of maintaining those small- and mid-sized farming operations
The reality is that we don't need another study, there are literally hundreds of studies about the safety of this technology.
It would likely mean a loss of 40,000 rental assistance units in rural America.