I look forward to joining him again in the Apollo energy legislation as I did in the last Congress, and this time I hope we will get it through because the way we produce and use energy in the United States is the greatest insult to our planet. There are a lot of things that we do that are dangerous, unclean, unproductive. But the way we produce and use energy is the greatest insult. And I think what we want to talk about is the word ``sustainable.'' We should be in this for the long haul for centuries to come. As we look back on a day like today when we celebrate the ongoing experiment of the American republic, we should be thinking, as those who wrote the Constitution were thinking, about something that would last for centuries. We should be embarking on a sustainable energy path. Not just clean energy, not just renewable energy, but a sustainable energy path that is environmentally sustainable, that is economically sustainable, and that is climactically sustainable. One of the big changes that has occurred... is here in Washington, and I think around the country, we have come to the conclusion... that global climate change, human induced global climate change, is real.
Steven Holt: “I look forward to joining him again in the Apollo energy legislation as I did in the last Congress, and this time I hope…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for sustainable energy legislation and addressing climate change.
Share
More from Steven Holt
I am pleased to yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Quigley), a coproposer and coauthor of this amendment.
I commend the authors of this resolution, Representatives McGovern, Jones, and Lee, for their leadership on this issue of war and peace. The topic of limiting our future military involvement in Iraq deserves more than 1 hour. It deserves…
My colleague from Oregon said it well: All does not equal best. The other side evidently is embarrassed by the language in the bill. There are many problems with this bill, but this particular section has some language that they should be…
I have an amendment at the desk that affects line 18, I believe. The Acting CHAIR. The Chair notes that the amendment addresses a portion of the bill not yet read for amendment. Is there objection to consideration of the amendment at this…