Mr. Chairman, we have discussed this matter quite a bit in the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and we agree that there should be more use of open sources. In fact, it should be routine, an integral part of every analyst's and every agency's work. It may not be necessary to have a center, as the gentleman suggests in his amendment, but I think as a sense of Congress this amendment is useful to emphasize the importance that open sources of information bring. Excessive reliance on information obtained from secret sources is not necessarily a good thing, and time and again, in example after example, we have discovered that openly published and openly discussed information is indeed superior, more correct than some of the secret information that analysts have been relying on excessively. So we think this is heading in the right direction.
Steven Holt: “Mr. Chairman, we have discussed this matter quite a bit in the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and we agree…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of using open sources in intelligence analysis.
Share
More from Steven Holt
Were it to become law, studies that might be used on regulations to keep drinking water safe or to prevent exposure to dangerous pesticides or other chemicals would be null and void. Let's be honest. The not-so-hidden motivations behind…
I thank my friend from California for this amendment, but also for her longstanding work on this issue and related issues. When we hear about this impossible situation which we find ourselves in today in Iraq, with the country clamoring…
Groups representing a diverse group of businesses and manufacturers support this amendment--groups that believe we should proceed with caution when making decisions about vast quantities of domestic energy resources. The Department of…
I am pleased to yield such time as he may consume to my colleague from Massachusetts (Mr. Lynch).