With those assurances from both Chairs, recognizing that the public debate is raging on and the need for this public information is now, I would be willing to withdraw my amendment and to work with the chairman, with the expectation that we can work something out in the coming months in this session of Congress.
Steven Holt: “With those assurances from both Chairs, recognizing that the public debate is raging on and the need for this public…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the withdrawal of an amendment in light of ongoing public debate.
Share
More from Steven Holt
I commend the authors of this resolution, Representatives McGovern, Jones, and Lee, for their leadership on this issue of war and peace. The topic of limiting our future military involvement in Iraq deserves more than 1 hour. It deserves…
This amendment answers questions millions of Americans have asked: Will we stop the government's unconstitutional searches of Americans' stored communications? Will we prohibit the government from deliberately sabotaging the security of…
The bill before us today has many problems, but one of the most egregious and obvious is in section 3, where the bill declares that any and all data submitted by States, tribes, or local governments shall be considered the ``best…
Were it to become law, studies that might be used on regulations to keep drinking water safe or to prevent exposure to dangerous pesticides or other chemicals would be null and void. Let's be honest. The not-so-hidden motivations behind…