Let me just say that it would be nice to do what is possible, but let us get one thing very, very clear. There was a vote on this House floor in 1997, after the program was eliminated, and the House voted affirmatively not to extend but to reinstate 245(i). That is the record of the House of Representatives. It is the record of the Senate on more than one occasion that they have voted to reinstate 245(i), the problem is when it comes to conference. So I think some of our colleagues think too little of the compassion and of the justice that can be done in this House. It is my belief that if we brought a vote back here for the reinstatement of 245(i), it would pass the House of Representatives. This should have been dealt with in the committee, the Committee on the Judiciary, marked up in the Committee on the Judiciary, and brought before this House to have a full debate so that we could amend it, so that we could listen to other points of view.
Roland Gutierrez: “Let me just say that it would be nice to do what is possible, but let us get one thing very, very clear. There was a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the reinstatement of 245(i) during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Roland Gutierrez
It took Rick Scott 23 days after Parkland to do that in Florida. And yet this governor in Texas doesn`t have the fortitude necessary to do the right thing or to listen to his constituents.
80 percent of Republican voters. 80 percent want an age limit increase on assault weapons. It’s what makes sense.
America needs to see this so that they can understand the extreme power of this ammunition and this weaponry, and so they can understand that an 18 year old with no training, should never have access to this type of weapon of war.
The vast majority of these same parents are simply asking for the minimal thing, which is an age increase to 21. And yet Greg Abbott has refused to call a special session.