Political Quotes

Pete Domenici: it has been the history of the Senate that we authorize legislation and we appropriate or pay for legislation that has…

On the recordJune 13, 2001
it has been the history of the Senate that we authorize legislation and we appropriate or pay for legislation that has been adopted. In this case, this sense-of-the-Senate resolution stands that on its head and says, whatever it is we voted on to be authorized, we shall fund. The appropriators shall pay for it. Now, historically we always authorize more than we can afford. We are doing the same thing in this bill. As a matter of fact, if that sense of the Senate were adopted, we would increase education 100 percent in the first year--not 10, not 20, not 30, but 100 percent. Over the next 7 years, we would increase it by $300 billion. This has nothing to do with the President's commitments. It has to do with the Senate taking a typical authorization bill and adding all kinds of nice, good, wholesome, wonderful amendments that we are not going to pay for because we don't have the money. The appropriators will pay for what they can afford. We cannot tell the appropriators in advance; they have a myriad of programs to look at in terms of priorities, and we would be telling them it is the sense of the majority of Members saying: Appropriators, you will; you shall; there is no escape; you will pay for every amendment that has been adopted as if it were appropriated.
Said by
Pete Domenici

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the implications of a sense-of-the-Senate resolution on education funding.

Share

More from Pete Domenici

Jun 18, 2012

Well, I would just say that, sometimes when we are working on trying to solve this fiscal problem, the recognition that a long-term fix is what is needed puts many people in the position that they do not know how you do that and do it now.

congress.gov
Jun 18, 2012

It would relate in some way to the process that you and I have learned and call reconciliation.

congress.gov
Jun 18, 2012

But that is compared to current policy--current policy. If we would compare your plan to current law, it is actually a tax cut.

congress.gov
Jun 18, 2012

I think it is very important, for some of you who have gone through lame duck, to make sure that you know it is not the best choice of an arena to which you would assign the solution of major problems.

congress.gov