But we do not have them yet. We have six of them now. I am looking out 20 years. I think our responsibility should be to really look out 20 years, 30 years, 40 years. I know one of my good friends on the other side of this issue has said there will be another bomber at some point. I think that is a total fallacy. It takes $10 billion to $15 billion now to get a fighter up, ready to be built. Who around here is going to vote $25 billion, $30 billion or $40 billion just to get another bomber developed? Why spend that kind of money when we have the great B-2?
Norman D. Dicks: “But we do not have them yet. We have six of them now. I am looking out 20 years. I think our responsibility should be to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing military spending and the development of new bombers.
Share
More from Norman D. Dicks
I can assure the gentleman from New Jersey that the committee intends to fund those programs that most effectively minimize suicides. And I'd point out that in most of these situations, this money is going to be competitively awarded. But…
I, too, echo the gentleman's interest in the field of directed energy and solid-state laser technology. With the threats and environment that the warfighter and the intelligence community are facing, the addition of new technologies that…
I yield 2 minutes to the distinguished gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Price), who's the ranking member on the Homeland Security Subcommittee.
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Ohio will be postponed.