if this amendment does not pass, significant portions of many States will be required to have flood insurance which has never been required before. The underlying bill says everywhere there is a dike, a dam, or a levy, regardless of the situation behind the dike, dam, or levy, regardless of how strong the dike, dam, or levy is, you will be required to have flood insurance. That is a very different jump from where we are today. Our amendment strikes that language and instead says there shall be a study and evaluation to make better determinations. This is a tough issue because we were behind levees that broke. It would have been a good idea, but this is a tax and fees on people without the appropriate study. That is what our amendment does.
Mitch Landrieu: “if this amendment does not pass, significant portions of many States will be required to have flood insurance which has…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to flood insurance requirements in the context of levees and flood management.
Share
More from Mitch Landrieu
New Orleans could have never come back on our own. We relied on the great help of the federal government, but the fate-based group, not for profits. Kids from all over America came and helped lift us back up.
This is so old and tired. It's been going on in this country forever. And I think people are really getting kind of tired.
There should be a full-blown open investigation and Chuck Ramsey knows this. He's the best in the country about this. The more open, the more transparent, the quicker you get information out and then you make sure people are held…
The fact still remains that Donald Trump's presidency was awful. Seventeen of his cabinet members left and said, 'Please don't elect him again.'