To address the question my friend from Texas raised, the question I think can be asked, what harm would this amendment cause? The amendment would cause no harm. I think that we do have a problem. We do have a problem today with English. We do have a problem that our country is breaking up into linguistic groups. I was on a call-in show in Canada, and one of the people called in and said, ``Don't you Americans realize how fortunate you are to have this one language, this commonality? Look what is happening here in Canada, where they are tearing the heart out of our country. Yet in America, you have hundreds of little Quebecs.'' I think that is clear.
Michael Roth: “To address the question my friend from Texas raised, the question I think can be asked, what harm would this amendment…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to language and cultural unity.
Share
More from Michael Roth
Of course, first, I have to thank my dear friend, our venerable colleague, and always gracious ranking member of the Finance Committee, Pat Moynihan. It would never have been possible to be here today with the kind of vote I think we are…
They should not only give me a license back, they also compensate me to get back in the business.
My own personal experience is that significant progress is being made. Let me give one illustration. When I was there the first time, an individual could not move from Beijing to another region.
I appreciate that. But let me add, you have been there, not from the beginning but you have played a major role in bringing about this world trade situation. I congratulate you and thank you for your leadership. Time is running out.