In layman's terms, as I interpret the amendment, and I agree, I respect the proponent of the amendment, the gentleman from New York, but as I read this bill, it cuts the losers-pay provision of the bill, because as I read this, it replaces the losers-pay language with language that would seem to make the attorneys of the party filing frivolous claims accountable.
Michael Roth: “In layman's terms, as I interpret the amendment, and I agree, I respect the proponent of the amendment, the gentleman…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to legal accountability for frivolous claims.
Share
More from Michael Roth
In a very real way, isn't this agreement all about whether America, the United States, our workers, our farmers, our businessmen, are going to have access to the Chinese markets? Isn't that what we are talking about?
Of course, first, I have to thank my dear friend, our venerable colleague, and always gracious ranking member of the Finance Committee, Pat Moynihan. It would never have been possible to be here today with the kind of vote I think we are…
I want the city of New York to restore my license at the downtown heliport, which they wrongfully took.
I really want to thank my personal staff, and my trade staff, whether it is Frank Polk, who is always there when you need him, and Grant Aldonas, Faryar Shirzad, Tim Keeler, J.T. Young, and Carrie Clark from the Finance Committee. I also…