I will vote against designating Yucca Mountain as a national nuclear waste repository at this time. I do so because there are simply too many unanswered questions, untested designs, and unproven procedures to approve a project that has such enormous consequences. Building a safe and secure storage site at Yucca Mountain and then filling it with some 77,000 tons of nuclear waste will take the next 30 to 40 years. Throughout those three and four decades, the design, the construction, the loading, the unloading, and the safe transportation of over 150,000 pounds of extremely poisonous nuclear waste must all be done perfectly--at least almost perfectly. One accident, one rupture, one attack would have devastating effects on the lives of people today and for generations to follow, as one look at a victim of the Chernobyl nuclear accident would confirm. Now those 150,000 pounds or as much as 200,000 pounds of radioactive waste has to be stored, contained, and isolated perfectly--almost perfectly--for thousands of years.
Mark Dayton: “I will vote against designating Yucca Mountain as a national nuclear waste repository at this time. I do so because…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the designation of Yucca Mountain as a nuclear waste repository during Senate debate.
Share
More from Mark Dayton
I join today with many of my colleagues in expressing ``no confidence'' in Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and urging President Bush to replace him. I truly respect the Secretary's commitment to public service, and I recognize that he…
may I inquire, are we in a period of morning business? The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senate is in morning business, with Senators allowed to speak for up to 10 minutes. ____________________
I'm just so disgusted with that man. To shoot any lion but to lure a lion like that out of the preserve and shoot him, I mean, how could anybody think that's sport? Just appalling.
Would this have happened if those passengers, the driver and passenger, were white? I don't think it would have.