Where the written law cannot be construed consistently with the natural, there is no reason why it should ever be enacted at all.
Lysander Spooner: “Where the written law cannot be construed consistently with the natural, there is no reason why it should ever be…”
Editor's note · Context
Spooner argues that laws lacking alignment with natural rights should not exist.
Share
More from Lysander Spooner
They do not tell us that they have established infallible supreme courts, to whom they refer all questions as to the legality of their acts, and that they do nothing that is not sanctioned by these courts.
They acknowledge it to be our unquestioned right and duty to kill them, if we can; that they expect nothing else, than that we will kill them, if we can; and that we are only fools and cowards, if we do not kill them, by any and every…
In short, they acknowledge themselves hostes humani generis: enemies of the human race.
They do not tell us of the almshouses, hospitals, schools, churches, etc., which, out of the purest charity and benevolence, they maintain for our benefit, out of the money they take from us.