If the judiciary can authoritatively dictate to a jury any exposition of the law, they can dictate to them the law itself, and such laws as they please; because laws are, in practice, one thing or another, according as they are expounded.
He warns that if the judiciary can dictate legal interpretations, it undermines the jury's independence.
Share
More from Lysander Spooner
It would also be making them consent to what they regard as the destruction of their own rights.
It is also sheer impudence, on their part, to assume that their commands are at all necessary to teach other men what is, and what is not, justice.
All other laws, it is optional with each man to obey, or not, as he may choose.
Juries would refuse to enforce a tax against a man who had never agreed to pay it.